View source for Talk:RFC-001

== [[User:Mpd|Mpd]] Comments and Questions ==
# I'd prefer "crs" to "srs", the latter being out step with, for example, EPSG and OGC terminology. Ditto for "LineString" and "Line", and perhaps (although less so) "Envelope" and "Box"
# Why reference PROJ.4's EPSG tables and not the EPSG tables themselves?  Do I sense a coordinate order holy war type thing going on?
# What about <nowiki>Multi[Point|LineString|Polygon]</nowiki> and GeometryCollection?
# What about Polygons with multiple rings?  [http://lists.geojson.org/pipermail/geojson-geojson.org/2007-March/000030.html An earlier proposal] handled this.
# How does a client determine whether the, for example, six ordinates in a Line/LineString are two x,y,z-s or three x,y-s?
# [http://lists.geojson.org/pipermail/geojson-geojson.org/2007-March/000016.html You suggested] an "Authors" section, for CC reasons.  Care to add one?
[[User:Mpd|Mpd]]

== [[User:AllanDoyle|AllanDoyle]] Response ==
# Shoot. I thought SRS was in vogue and CRS is out. Great. Let's go with crs. I have no preference with linestring, etc.
# PROJ vs EPSG. PROJ is what coders will see. They may never look at EPSG. Few people will use anything other than PROJ.
# Multi Schmulti, I always say. :)
# Rings Schmings... toss 'em in.
# This is JSON, not GML, so we should (a) use commas and (b) use proper arrays and arrays of arrays.
# Drat. OK. Authors coming right up.